On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 16:50, Vincent Massol wrote: > The reason I'm asking is to judge whether we can commit it to HEAD > easily. I would like to avoid as much as possible big changes that take > long time. Remember the problem we had a few months back when we made > some big change in HEAD and HEAD stayed broken for way too long.
It was way too long, it just shouldn't have been committed. But that won't happen again because I won't commit code anymore simply because someone asks me to. > > > > > Will it be backward compatible for 1.0 > > > users? > > > > To my knowledge what is represented in model file for 3.0.0 is > accurate, > > but if it's not it's easy to correct. To use the v4.0.0 POM we would > > just need to look at the version specified and folks could even use a > > v4.0.0 POM and internally we could convert back to v3.0.0 if the > > majority of the plugins require it. > > Cool If you want to see it integrated in working form I can do it a day next week. I assume you want to try out some of the newer elements? We'll just see what Brett's up to, I don't want to step on any toes as the 1.0 code is his as far as I'm concerned. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder ... -- Thoreau --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
