I am trying to explain to you in second thread that removing Guice will
remove all related issues.

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 5:09 PM Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tibor,
>
> you're doing it again. The title of this topic is "Second MNG-6765
> ([Regression] tycho pom-less builds fails with 3.6.2)" and none of your
> comments helped on that, i.e. trying to move it forward.
> Based on your reply you should a new discussion on the mailinglist.
>
> Robert
>
> ps. I won't make it to ApacheCon this year.
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:48:36 +0200, Tibor Digana <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Robert we suffer from bad design in Maven. There is Jira issue where Maven
> accepted these annotation maybe because they are so famous and I do not
> remember if we had any Vote for this significant change. If there was a
> Vote I would vote -1 and I would explain why.
> We can talk about it in the conference the next week but gaian I am saying
> that this feature with these annotations crerated conflicts between Maven
> and plugins.
> I doubt that Google Guice is certified by TCK and the Oracle which means
> that these annotations are a fan of developers but not a container I can
> trust.
> Additionally, joining Maven domain with EE domain is like joining Applet
> with Weld container of EE, the same mess.
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 3:41 PM Robert Scholte <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Tibor, please lower your voice.
>> You're turning this topic into an unnecessary fight.
>> We're solving a regression introduced in 3.6.2.
>> Stuart was able to identify the problem, provide the fix and clearly
>> explain what happened.
>> Code has been review, fix is confirmed, so we're good to go.
>>
>> So don't hijack this thread and complain by sharing your strong opinions.
>> They might be related to the code we're touching, but it doesn't help
>> fixing the issue.
>> If you want to discuss that, please just start a new topic on the
>> dev-list.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Robert
>>
>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:20:23 +0200, Tibor Digana <[email protected]>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Stuart, you are wrong.
>> > It is no more Java SE
>> > It is JakartaEE ans if you want to obey wrong design of Java SE go for
>> it
>> > but then Maven would become a mess of Java EE annotations in non-EE
>> > container.
>> > Do you understand that @Name represents a key in the container? And
>> how
>> > can
>> > you create a string like "core-default"? What's that? I do not know.
>> > It would be worth to have commercial experiences with Java EE and then
>> > you
>> > will understand that this is a big mistake and mess in Maven.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:31 PM Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> @Named is not specific to Java EE, it's from JSR 330 which actually
>> >> targets
>> >> Java SE (and there are many SE based containers that support it)
>> >>
>> >> All @Named does is give a component an identity in the container (think
>> >> of @Named like the hint in Plexus [1]) so it can be referenced by
>> that
>> >> name
>> >> elsewhere. It also means you can inject lists or maps, where the key
>> is
>> >> the
>> >> name, of all component implementations for a given type. This lets
>> >> plugins
>> >> and extensions contribute implementations of a core type and core can
>> >> then
>> >> see them and choose the right one for the job (such as "file" for a
>> file
>> >> specific implementation.)
>> >>
>> >> Maven historically also supports overriding of components by plugins
>> and
>> >> extensions, where if you have a component with the same interface
>> (role)
>> >> and name (hint) then it can override the core component while that
>> >> plugin
>> >> is active. This lets plugins customize certain core behaviour in a
>> >> controlled manner. If we didn't allow overriding then a lot of plugins
>> >> would fail and Maven would be a lot less flexible.
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Sisu/PlexusMigration
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 11:58, Tibor Digana <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Are you talking about
>> >> > @Named( “not-default” )
>> >> > @Named( “coreAllowingOverride” ) or @Named( “coreExtensionPoint” )?
>> >> >
>> >> > In Java EE (and these annotations are from Java EE application
>> >> servers)
>> >> > mean the name of the bean which is unique - it is not a group of
>> >> beans.
>> >> > Please notice that beans container is Map<String, Bean> simply
>> >> speaking.
>> >> > and therefore here it would mean :
>> >> >
>> >> > "core-default" -> singleton instance (DefaultModelProcessor@1234567)
>> >> >
>> >> > so this means a conflict because you cannot create:
>> >> >
>> >> > "core-default" -> singleton instance (DefaultModelProcessor@1234567)
>> >> > "core-default" -> singleton instance (DefaultResolver@1234567)
>> >> > "core-default" -> singleton instance (AnotherBeanType@1234567)
>> >> >
>> >> > logical would be to have Expression API from Java EE and:
>> >> >
>> >> > "core-default-modelprocessor" -> singleton instance
>> >> > (DefaultModelProcessor@1234567)
>> >> > "core-default-resolver" -> singleton instance
>> >> (DefaultResolver@1234567)
>> >> > "core-default-xxx" -> singleton instance (AnotherBeanType@1234567)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 12:03 PM Hervé BOUTEMY <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > +1
>> >> > > just added a comment on a typo
>> >> > >
>> >> > > for the name of the component, perhaps "core-default", but I won't
>> >> > > complain
>> >> > > about any choice: the javadoc is what was really needed
>> >> > >
>> >> > > notice: perhaps we have other component that should have the same
>> >> > > improvement
>> >> > > to permit overriding in the future
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hervé
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Le vendredi 18 octobre 2019, 20:04:53 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit :
>> >> > > > Hi,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > with the help from Stuart McCulloch we've been able to provide a
>> >> patch
>> >> > > for
>> >> > > > MNG-6765[1]
>> >> > > > Please review and test.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > thanks,
>> >> > > > Robert
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6765
>> >> > > > [2]
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/24e6c0ec0a87b6682513287a23c36db6996b8
>> >> > > > 74c [3]
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/53a70bc8543124569ee787725b2004bc92a68
>> >> > > > 1b6
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to