Why must we replace Jelly ?? Isn't it better to correct/enhance it ????
Arnaud > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Rafal Krzewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : jeudi 13 mai 2004 09:23 > À : Maven Developers List > Objet : Re: cvs commit: > maven-components/maven-core/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/lif > ecycle/pha > se GoalDecorationPhaseTest.java > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > o adding John Casey's patch which adds support for > maven.xml processing in > > maven2 using marmlade which is a Jelly replacement. > > > + <!-- Used to support maven.xml script and goal > decorating in general. --> > > + <dependency> > > + <groupId>marmalade</groupId> > > + <artifactId>marmalade-core</artifactId> > > + <version>0.1</version> > > + </dependency> > > + <dependency> > > + <groupId>marmalade</groupId> > > + <artifactId>marmalade-el-ognl</artifactId> > > + <version>0.1</version> > > + </dependency> > > Another "fascinating but evil" scripting thingy? ;-) > > Where do I find more info? > > http://marmalade.codehaus.org/ > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10528 > > are not very informative :-) > > R. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
