extension is. > > > > Discussion are archived which we had an are probably > locatable looking > > for type/kind/artifacts. Michal, Rafal and myself were among the > > participants that I can recall off hand. > > Sure but we were discussing making the artifact handler > configurable by > end users (there's currently a artifact handler but it's not > configurable). Is that possible with what you have already discussed > with Michal and Rafal? >
We have only dissussed the idea itself not the implementation details. I don't see any reasons why handlers should not be "configurable" by users. regards Michal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
