yeikel commented on pull request #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/21#issuecomment-910950725


   > > > Somewhat. They block Jetty for everyone(including the projects where 
the vulnerabilities applies) which affects this plugin indirectly.
   > > > If it helps, what we use is similar to this :
   > > > 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/blog.sonatype.com/keeping-third-party-dependencies-in-check-with-nexus%3fhs_amp=true
   > > 
   > > Many vendors provide this superficial crap -- as you can see it proves 
nothing here.
   > > 
   > 
   > @michael-o 
   > so many tools send warning/alarms because of dependencies with security 
issues/CVE.
   > maybe (certainly) it's wrong but big companies use those tools as a policy 
and we can't fight this!!
   > BUT we still want people using Apache Maven so we have to live with that!
   > 
   > @yeikel 
   > I will update this PR
   > 
   > > > If this PR is considered stale then I can resume and maybe target the 
latest version instead?
   > > 
   > > Split between Java 8 upgrade and Jetty upgrade in at least two PRs.
   > > 
   > > @hboutemy @rfscholte Yet another reason why we need to split this plugin 
in two.
   > 
   > 
   
   Definitely. We had to overwrite the version manually in our build  to be 
able to use the plugin but doing so without the corresponding tests could 
introduce unexpected regressions for us


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to