Sorry I thought you where talking about log4j v2, not v1. I can see it
downloads the metadata about the project but non or the jars;
local-repo/log4j
local-repo/log4j/log4j
local-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.12/log4j-1.2.12.pom
local-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.12/log4j-1.2.12.pom.sha1
local-repo/log4j
local-repo/log4j/log4j
local-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.12
local-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.12/log4j-1.2.12.pom
local-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.12/log4j-1.2.12.pom.sha1
local-repo/log4j/log4j/1.2.12/_remote.repositories

So I would still say false positive, as the jar is not actually used.

But looking at the dependency tree it would need the apache commons to
update commons-logging:commons-logging, then
ommons-digester:commons-digester then org.apache.velocity:velocity-tools,
then it gets to the 1st dependency within the maven ecosystem.
So 5 ish patches to 5 separate projects to upgrade, test and release, each
before then next pr can progress.

John


On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 07:53, Thomas Matthijs <li...@selckin.be> wrote:

> That was just to demonstrate how i got the dependency chain, that file
> was there, but if you're going to be this hostile, i'm not interested
> anymore, muting thread
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 08:48, Piotr Żygieło <piotr.zygi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 08:37, Thomas Matthijs <li...@selckin.be> wrote:
> > >
> > > Can confirm this project downloads log4j 1.12.12 for me
> >
> > As I see it - you confirm something else.
> >
> > > Failed to read artifact descriptor for log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.12:
> >
> > Failed to read artifact descriptor for log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.12:
> > _artifact descriptor_
> >
> > --
> > Piotrek
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to