I suppose you could raise PRs to the origin/mvn4 branch ? Maybe even commit
changes directly, if that makes sense.

Le lun. 14 mars 2022 à 16:43, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> a écrit :

> Am 2022-03-14 um 08:59 schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As Michael hinted at this new API in the "[DISCUSS] Radical Fast Forward
> to
> > 3.5.4" thread, I'd like to start the discussion around it.
> >
> > Over the past weeks, I've worked on an experimental API for Maven 4.x.
> > The goals are multiple :
> >    * fix some problems with designs that do not work well with
> multithreading
> >    * offer a way to finally get rid of deprecated code
> >    * offer a complete API (which would deprecate m-artifact-transfer,
> > m-dependency-tree)
> >    * offer an homogeneous and a bit more modern API
> >    * completely hide the maven-resolver, so that it can finally upgrade
> to a
> > v2 with the package renamed without too much disturbance
> >
> > The goal would be to extract the models and API in a separate project
> with
> > a much lower release cycle, as those rarely change, but are currently
> > released with each version of maven.
> >
> > The current API can be seen at [1].  Note that the plugins API has also
> > been included within the new API and the plugin tools have been updated
> so
> > that the maven-plugin-plugin supports both v3 api and the new v4 api.  A
> > new flag has been added to the MojoDescriptor to know if the plugin is
> > using the old or the new api.  The plugin testing harness tools have been
> > updated to junit 5 and now provide a few annotations [2] to help writing
> > plugin tests [3].  The maven-core has been enhanced to support loading
> > those new v4 plugins along with the v3 ones, which means they can work
> > side-by-side in the same build.  This is done by implementing the new API
> > by wrapping the v3 implementation classes (such as MavenSession,
> > MavenProject, etc...) [4].
> > I've ported a few plugins such as clean [5], install [6], deploy [7] as a
> > proof-of-concept that this actually works.
> >
> > The very rough goal would be to to have multiple phases:
> >    * continue the work on this API so that it can actually cover all use
> > cases for plugins, create a new project with the new API and models, make
> > sure plugins can work correctly with the new API / implementation
> >    * release the API, then maven-core supporting the new API
> >    * upgrade plugins to the new API, deprecate old components and API
> >    * once all plugins have migrated to the new API, switch maven-core
> > implementation to the new API
> >
> > I'm eager to hear your thoughts !
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/maven/tree/mvn4/maven-core-api/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/api
> > [2]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-testing/tree/mvn4/maven-plugin-testing-harness/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/api/plugin/testing
> > [3]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/maven-deploy-plugin/blob/mvn4/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/deploy/DeployFileMojoTest.java
> > [4]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/maven/tree/mvn4/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/internal/impl
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/maven-clean-plugin/tree/mvn4/
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/maven-install-plugin/tree/mvn4/
> > [7] https://github.com/apache/maven-deploy-plugin/tree/mvn4/
> >
>
> MASSIVE! Nothing else to say. I have taken a look at [1] and see already
> room for improvement. What is the best way to comment on code?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to