Maybe for log4j a major difference will be the versioning. Having a compatibility matrix is always a pain for end users so several projects abandonned that to just be a monorelease repo. Except that it depends who work on what more than anything, technically all works and none is better than others.
Le sam. 26 août 2023 à 16:03, Hervé Boutemy <herve.bout...@free.fr> a écrit : > notice that you call it "multi-repo experience" > it's in fact more about a topic of component-oriented structure, each > component having its own release lifecycle. The fact that each component > has > his own Git repository is just an implementation detail (in the past, each > component had its own root directory in Subversion: see [1] for how we > went > from svn structure to Git one). > > > Would you still go the same route if Maven is founded today? > yes: Maven is a core, with plugins (and extension) = something we would > not > change without loosing critical aspects of Maven > and the fact that some plugins reuse some shared components is normal > > of course, the exact number of plugins and shared components could have > been > done with different granularity > > And on using Google repo tool and the precise directory organisation when > checking out everything, it's an implementation detail: > https://github.com/apache/maven-sources/tree/master > Changing anything here can be done, it's not critical: what is critical is > the > component-oriented approach. Then the granularity chosen for these > components. > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration > > Le samedi 26 août 2023, 09:50:28 CEST Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > > Hi Volkan, > > > > Yes, I worked a lot on this aspect fo Maven: the result is summarised > here > > https://maven.apache.org/scm.html > > > > As you can see, you can get "Maven Full Sources" in one command using > Google > > "repo" tool. > > > > Please have a llok and we can dive into more details if you need > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le jeudi 24 août 2023, 12:30:41 CEST Volkan Yazıcı a écrit : > > > Hello, > > > > > > Log4j crew is considering moving to a multi-repo structure. If I am not > > > mistaken, there are 125 `github.com/apache/maven-*` > <http://github.com/apache/maven-*> > > > <http://github.com/apache/maven-*> repos, which makes me believe that > you > > > have quite a bit of experience with such a construct. I am curious to > hear > > > your thoughts on the matter. > > > > > > How does it work for you? > > > What are its advantages? > > > What are its disadvantages? > > > What are the things we should be extra cautious about? > > > Are there any major pillars we need to erect for such a construct to > work? > > > Would you still go the same route if Maven is founded today? > > > > > > I deliberately don't share in this post our goals with such a > migration to > > > avoid manipulating your line of thinking. I can do that later to give > the > > > conversation a little bit more context. > > > > > > Kind regards. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
