On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 1:15 PM Xeno Amess <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> well, adding custom elements, makes it cannot pass xsd, right?

Depends on what the XSD says. Not that satisfying the XSD is or should
be a requirement.

> or we shall allow any element name? but that would kill typo check, like if
> somebody wrongly said, <dependencys>, and spend a whole day finding what be
> wrong.

Namespaces could resolve that.

> or is there some way to allow some...prefix?or allow-all-namespace like
> <custom:property1> or something?
>

Yes, there is.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold
[email protected]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to