Hi all,

In a recent PR review, the use of AssertJ assertions was raised as a point
of discussion.
To avoid recurring debates and ensure the PR is reviewed for the changes
it provides, I’d like to propose that we clarify the goal regarding this,
and perhaps other, dependencies.

Specifically, should we:

- Remove the AssertJ dependency entirely to prevent its use?
- State that we support the dependency and accept its use in our tests?

Having a clear stance on this would help streamline code reviews and avoid
repeated discussions on future PRs.

Perhaps there are already some guidelines on this which I'm unaware of, so
I'm looking forward to your input.

Regards,

Giovanni van der Schelde

Reply via email to