> Am 04.04.2026 um 22:37 schrieb Martin Desruisseaux via dev 
> <[email protected]>:
> Namespaces are not intended to be a way to identify the version. Again, this 
> is similar to Java packages. We don't rename "java.util" to a new name 
> ("java.util.v21", "java.util.v22") every time that a new Java version is 
> released.

I thought the idea of maven 4 was to prepare for faster moves and enabling 
breaking changes like e.g. one-line-gav definitions possibly with attributes. 
java.util to my knowledge never broke compatibility while javax/jakarta did so 
mostly for corporate licensing.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Mirko Friedenhagen
— 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to