Hi, good point, we could even now analyse which SCM is in use and dependent on that set the variable to a sensible default, does not even require any model change.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Mirko Friedenhagen -- Am 21.08.26 um 15:27 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > Hi, > > since maven 4 has the project root now we can also test the .git presence > and prefer it over a hardcoded default, can be smoother for everyone no? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog > <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | > Old > Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> > Javaccino <https://javaccino.dev/> founder (Java/.NET service - contact via > linkedin) > > > Le ven. 21 août 2026 à 15:17, Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > I assume most projects nowadays use git or at least another SCM where > > simply appending a slash and the artifactId to the parent's value is > > usually wrong. Given that model 4.1 breaks stuff anyways, would it feasible > > to switch the default? > > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > Mirko Friedenhagen > > — > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
