On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 06:21, Vincent Massol wrote:
> The way is was coded initially was making it very difficult to integrate
> it with Maven. Maybe it has changed.

apparently not much... 

> I agree that the idea of Jester is excellent and that it would be nice
> to have a Maven plugin for it (but I fear it's still not very
> build-friendly).

I managed to run it on part of the maven core.
I half manually made a TestAlls class (but I had to remove some tests which were 
failing in my command line running of the full suite, perhaps due to bad environment 
settings?)

Anyway, 3 hours later, and after me falling asleep waiting for it to finish, I get 
some results.
Not much to say: nothing failed. So either you guys rock at writing unit tests, either 
jester isn't good for this kind of project.

I attach the html results for anyone interested. It's not much point to attach the xml 
file. Jester wants the source around to be able to produce the html version.

So I don't think it is worth having that as part of the build process, but maybe 
running every couple of months would be a good idea.

Jerome

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to