Either works (in terms of the release process), but yes - I probably should have
put it there too.

- Brett

Quoting Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On 27 Jun 2004 08:05:07 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > brett       2004/06/27 01:05:07
> > 
> >   Modified:    hibernate project.xml
> >                hibernate/xdocs changes.xml
> >   Index: changes.xml
> >   ===================================================================
> >   RCS file: /home/cvs/maven-plugins/hibernate/xdocs/changes.xml,v
> >   retrieving revision 1.14
> >   retrieving revision 1.15
> >   diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
> >   --- changes.xml       4 Jun 2004 12:57:15 -0000       1.14
> >   +++ changes.xml       27 Jun 2004 08:05:07 -0000      1.15
> >   @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> >        <author email="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Michal Maczka</author>
> >      </properties>
> >      <body>
> >   -    <release version="1.2" date="">
> >   +    <release version="1.2" date="in CVS">
> 
> I thought the convention these days was to put the -SNAPSHOT on the
> version attribute?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to