It's actually part of jexl....and neither of them are well documented.

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:45:19 +0200, Arnaud Heritier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I didn't find this syntax!!
> I'll correct it.
> 
> Where are documented the keywords in Jelly??
> 
> Arnaud
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : samedi 10 juillet 2004 01:53
> > À : Maven Developers List
> > Objet : Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/javadoc plugin.jelly
> 
> 
> >
> > On 9 Jul 2004 18:50:48 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > aheritier    2004/07/09 11:50:48
> > >
> > >   Modified:    javadoc  plugin.jelly
> > >   Log:
> > >   To generate javadoc when sourceModifications are used, we copy in a temporary 
> > > directory all the
> > needed source files.
> > >   Fix MPJAVADOC-32
> >
> > >   +          <j:if test="${pom.build.sourceModifications!=null &amp;&amp;
> > !pom.build.sourceModifications.isEmpty()}">
> >
> > I always find 'and' easier to read than &amp;&amp;
> > --
> > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to