It's actually part of jexl....and neither of them are well documented. On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:45:19 +0200, Arnaud Heritier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, I didn't find this syntax!! > I'll correct it. > > Where are documented the keywords in Jelly?? > > Arnaud > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Envoyé : samedi 10 juillet 2004 01:53 > > À : Maven Developers List > > Objet : Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/javadoc plugin.jelly > > > > > > On 9 Jul 2004 18:50:48 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > aheritier 2004/07/09 11:50:48 > > > > > > Modified: javadoc plugin.jelly > > > Log: > > > To generate javadoc when sourceModifications are used, we copy in a temporary > > > directory all the > > needed source files. > > > Fix MPJAVADOC-32 > > > > > + <j:if test="${pom.build.sourceModifications!=null && > > !pom.build.sourceModifications.isEmpty()}"> > > > > I always find 'and' easier to read than && > > -- > > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]