The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Dennis Lundberg
Created: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 7:40 AM
Body:
Having just read just about all of the documentation for Maven, I agree with this
suggestion. There were several times that I had to stop for a minute and think: What
kind of "repository" are we talking about here?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1109?page=comments#action_22087
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1109
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MAVEN-1109
Summary: Change <repository/> element to <scm/> element to reflect what it
actually is.
Type: Improvement
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Original Estimate: Unknown
Time Spent: Unknown
Remaining: Unknown
Project: maven
Versions:
1.0-rc1
Assignee:
Reporter: Jason van Zyl
Created: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 5:59 PM
Updated: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 7:40 AM
Description:
Deprecate the use the <repository/> element as we have a fundamental conflict in
nomenclature which is the local/remote repository and the source repository. It would
be more clear to have an <scm/> element and avoid the use of repository unless we are
talking about artifact repositories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
