What do you mean noone knows how it got there?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] maven]$ ls -la | grep taglibs
drwxrwsr-x    6 vmassol  maven        4096 Oct  8  2003 taglibs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] maven]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] taglibs]$ cd jars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jars]$ ls -la
total 1124
drwxrwsr-x    2 vmassol  maven        4096 Oct  8  2003 .
drwxrwsr-x    6 vmassol  maven        4096 Oct  8  2003 ..
-rw-rw-r--    1 dion     maven       39427 Feb  8  2003 request-1.0.1.jar
-rw-rw-r--    1 dion     maven          33 Feb  8  2003 request-1.0.1.jar.md5
-rw-rw-r--    1 vmassol  maven      516487 Nov 12  2002 standard-1.0.2.jar
-rw-rw-r--    1 vmassol  maven          33 Jan  3  2003 standard-1.0.2.jar.md5
-rwxrwxr--    1 dion     maven      515008 Oct  8  2003 standard-1.0.4.jar
-rw-rw-r--    1 dion     maven          33 Oct  8  2003 standard-1.0.4.jar.md5
-rwxrwxr--    1 dion     maven       40212 Sep 22  2003 string-1.0.1.jar
-rw-rw-r--    1 dion     maven          33 Sep 22  2003 string-1.0.1.jar.md5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jars]$



On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:39:05 -0300, Felipe Leme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 04:17, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> > Structure is correct, but I prefer this:
> > taglibs
> >     jars
> >         all jars
> 
> The problem with that structure is that the project has many taglibs, so
> the directory will be too packed (right now, for instance, there are 35
> jars, 87 tlds and 50 wars). The structure I proposed follows the same
> approach used by the Jakarta Commons project.
> 
> > and there are already a directory group taglibs on ibiblio.
> > It's more usable if we have only one group by project.
> 
> I agree, but that group is kind of rogue - nobody knows how it got there
> and it has never been updated. And even if we use it, there is also a
> jstl group too, so we would need to put the jstl jars over there (and
> these jars are build from the Taglibs Standard project).
> 
> I don't know how is the 'backward compatibility' policy on ibiblio, but
> I rather remove these old groups (standard and jstl). If that is not
> possible (and I guess it isn't), we could at least but a README there
> stating they are obsolete groups.
> 
> -- Felipe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to