Wow...  If it's easy, I say go for it..   There are a lot of situations
where plugins call test:compile, java:compile, and other well known goals
just to ensure that the step happened..  I can see this attribute being very
useful..

Can you share what types of backwards compatibility affects this would
really have..?  I can't really think of any..  It would be nice for 1.1...

Wait, scratch that..  You're on holiday till the 16th!

Eric

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 4:12 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Avoid running multiple goals (was: RE: issue w/ test:test
> goal being run multiple times when dist goal is executed)
>
>
> There is an issue in JIRA for this. it is really easy for me to
> enable this feature, but it breaks
> existing builds. If we can sacrifice backwards compat., then I'm
> happy to do it.
>
> It already works for prereqs.
>
> I was actually thinking it would be better to add an attribute to
> the attainGoal that
> defaulted to false for backwards compat, but when set to true
> made sure it didn't run again.
> We can do that in 1.1 if wanted.
>
> m2 does it completely differently and it is not an issue. There
> is actually a defined lifecycle :)
>
> - Brett
>
> Quoting "March, Andres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I am also confused as to how goals are determined to be run.  I
> thought it
> > would be like ant where a goal would only be run once.  Could
> someone explain
> > how this is possible and if not why?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:03 PM
> > > To: 'Maven Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Maven Developers List'
> > > Subject: Avoid running multiple goals (was: RE: issue w/
> test:test goal
> > > being run multiple times when dist goal is executed)
> > >
> > > I personally run site with junit, clover and jcoverage
> reports and would
> > > be
> > > difficult to skip test:test.
> > >
> > > I see it more a general question for all plugins. Maven
> should keep track
> > > of
> > > goals run and don't run again them. Plugins should be able to override
> > > that,
> > > e.g. clover could set test:test as "not run".
> > >
> > > I don't know if this was thought for next releases and m2, can anyone
> > > tell?
> > >
> > > I'll move this discussion to developer list.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Carlos Sanchez
> > > A Coruņa, Spain
> > >
> > > Oness Project
> > > http://oness.sourceforge.net
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 6:41 PM
> > > > To: Carlos Sanchez; 'Maven Users List'
> > > > Subject: RE: issue w/ test:test goal being run multiple times
> > > > when dist goal is executed
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I'm actually thinking that the pregoal would be the way
> > > > to go..  But, I see it as something you configure your
> > > > project..  for example, if you want the tests to run, but you
> > > > need to do the bytecode manipulation, then set the preGoal to
> > > > set maven.test.skip=true after running once, and have clover
> > > > or jcoverage run first..
> > > >
> > > > If you run either first, and then run the junit report, it
> > > > doesn't have to
> > > > run the test:test again...   What clover or jcoverage output
> > > > has everything
> > > > the report needs..
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 5:44 PM
> > > > > To: 'Maven Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: RE: issue w/ test:test goal being run multiple times when
> > > > > dist goal is executed
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just be sure that it does't break plugins that need to
> > > > rerun test:test
> > > > > as clover or jcoverage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos Sanchez
> > > > > A Coruņa, Spain
> > > > >
> > > > > Oness Project
> > > > > http://oness.sourceforge.net
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 5:41 PM
> > > > > > To: Maven Users List
> > > > > > Subject: RE: issue w/ test:test goal being run multiple
> > > > times when
> > > > > > dist goal is executed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've seen the same thing, and actually thought about some
> > > > > > fixes..   Could
> > > > > > make junit-report smarter to only run if the unit test
> > > > report files
> > > > > > don't exist.  Could also introduce some sort of pregoal
> > > > to test:test
> > > > > > that checks and if the tests have been run, then set
> > > > > > maven.test.skip=true..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eric
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Springer, Ian P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:48 PM
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: issue w/ test:test goal being run multiple times when
> > > > > > > dist goal is executed
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I run "maven dist", my project's unit tests get run
> > > > > > three times:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) because test:test is a prereq of jar:jar
> > > > > > > 2) because test:test is a prereq of war:webapp
> > > > > > >   (which I call from a dist:prepare-bin-filesystem postgoal in
> > > > > > > maven.xml)
> > > > > > > 3) because junit-report:report does an attainGoal of test:test
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Running the unit test three times slows down the dist build
> > > > > > and also
> > > > > > > clutters Maven's output. Does anyone know of a
> > > > workaround for this
> > > > > > > issue?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Ian
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to