The following comment has been added to this issue:

     Author: Julien Kirch
    Created: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 3:09 AM
       Body:
I observed a side effect of the patch, I'm not sure it's the one that causes the bug 
on cactus but this one will probably requires a look and/or some changes in the 
plugins :

in a script we are getting a dependency of type zip, and we were accessing it with a :

<j:set var="fooVar" value="${pom.getDependency('fooGroup:barName')}"/>

(dependency of group "fooGroup" and of name "barName")

with the patch, this leads to an empty dependency, so the code is now :

<j:set var="fooVar" value="${pom.getDependency('fooGroup:barName:zip')}"/>

hope this may help
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1087?page=comments#action_24094

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1087

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: MAVEN-1087
    Summary: Dependency type should participate in equals() and hashcode()
       Type: Bug

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Major

 Original Estimate: 1 hour
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: 1 hour

    Project: maven
 Components: 
             model
   Fix Fors:
             1.1
   Versions:
             1.0

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Eric Bottard

    Created: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 3:48 PM
    Updated: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 3:09 AM

Description:
I was trying to bundle taglibs in a war project when i stumbled into this unexpected 
behavior : for each and every taglib in my web-app, either the jar file or the tld got 
copied to the target web-app, but I could not get them to be copied together.

After a moment I realized that the dependency for a given taglib (one jar and one tld) 
had the same artifactId but different types (jar and tld). A quick hack in the war 
plugin shows that the forEach loop only sees one of the two.

So I guess that the dependency type should participate in equals() and hashcode() for 
a dependency (or modify the getId() of Dependency, but I don't know the other impacts).




---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to