On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 15:03, Brett Porter wrote: > Actually, it will, because it starts with a number :) > > I'm not particularly happy with the property syntax for JAR overrides > and its dual meaning, but something that can be rectified later.
I think it would be perfectly fine to only allow the specification of a property that indicated a version. All artifacts then must be present in a repository and not in some random place in the filesystem. That hack was added for whacky jakarta commons usage and I would be more than happy to see it go away. > - Brett > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > >On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 23:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>brett 2004/12/03 23:07:08 > >> > >> Modified: src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH > >> ArtifactListBuilder.java > >> Log: > >> has to match exactly, as a path can contain SNAPSHOT > >> > >> > > > >Then determine whether the property is for a path or version because > >what you've changed won't allow 1.1-SNAPSHOT as a version which is what > >we've decided we're going to allow. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://maven.apache.org happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come and sit softly on your shoulder ... -- Thoreau --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
