The following comment has been added to this issue:

     Author: David Eric Pugh
    Created: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:57 PM
       Body:
I think the idea of eclipse.dependency is to filter out completely those 
dependencies..  The options are true/false, and default to true.  So, if the 
eclipse.dependency is skipped, that is the same as true.

It is possible we need to have something more like:
eclipse.dependencyType that specifies what something is...

Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPECLIPSE-59?page=comments#action_30417

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPECLIPSE-59

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: MPECLIPSE-59
    Summary: Skipped dependency with eclipse.dependency  false
       Type: Bug

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Minor

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: maven-eclipse-plugin

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Henri Bonnehuit

    Created: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 8:00 AM
    Updated: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:57 PM
Environment: Java 1.4.2_04, win2k

Description:
A dependency element like:

<eclipse.dependency>true</eclipse.dependency>

in project.xml causes maven eclipse to skip the dependency completely,
rather than reverting to simple .classpath entry.

I have maven-eclipse-plugin-1.9.jar and maven v. 1.0.1


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to