+1, with a fairly sizeable note on the web site that it needs love to be put back.
Though in AW's case, I doubt it makes sense. There will only need to be an AspectJ 5.0 plugin soon... - Brett Vincent Massol wrote: >Hi, > >I haven't been updating the apsectwerkz plugin for a while (shame on me but >I had taken an interest in AW some time back and moved on something else >afterwards - I may find interest in it again in the future though). > >The last time I touched it AW was at version 0.9 and it's now at version >2.0. I don't think it works anymore as software you don't touch rot. > >What is our strategy for dealing with plugins that are not getting updated? > >Should we leave it as it is? >Should we move it back to sandbox? >Should we create a graveyard? > >I've tried to donate it to the AW's project but they don't want it. They are >ok to dump it on their wiki though but I'm not sure this is good enough. > >I think the best is probably to move it somewhere (sandbox for example) so >that it can wait till someone is interested to send patches for it and it >would clearly signify to end users that we don't currently support it. > >WDYT? > >-Vincent > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
