Right. I would think that anything listing dependencies where the submitter makes them up, we may need to be more vigilant about them now.
Hopefully, we can continue to arrange to get these from the source rather than relying on the upload process. Cheers, Brett Carlos Sanchez wrote: >They are "sintactically" valid, but maybe they need "semantic" changes >in the future as people begin to use transitive dependencies. > >On 5/7/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Carlos Sanchez wrote: >> >> >> >>>when you say the sources you mean the repositories that are sync'ed to >>>to ibiblio (apache, codehaus,...)? that doesn't apply to artifacts >>>uploaded through the jira process that go directly to >>>repository-staging >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Correct. I Assume the POMs coming through the upload process already get >>checked for validity. >> >>Cheers, >>Brett >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
