[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1397?page=comments#action_44486 ] 

Andy Glick commented on MAVEN-1397:
-----------------------------------

Brett,

I set out to figure out how to help with the surefire port rather than on the 
m1 test plugin. Unfortunately, I seem to be missing the information that I need 
to be useful, so if you could help me out....

I have checked out the Maven 1 code, and I see that there is the beginning of a 
plugin to call the M2 surefire plugin.  I downloaded an m2 version from the svn 
repository. I learned that it depended on surefire code from Codehaus. I have 
an old cvs checkout of the Codehaus code, but it is out of date with the code 
in svn at Codehaus. I can't find the surefire svn repo at codehaus, can you 
give me a pointer? Is there any other information that you can point me to? Is 
there a list of M1 test plugin usecases and/or a list of m2 surefire usecases? 
I'm going to take a look at the how to build a plugin examples. Thanks for your 
response to my question about configuraing a plugin with includes and excludes.

> replace test plugin with surefire
> ---------------------------------
>
>          Key: MAVEN-1397
>          URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1397
>      Project: Maven
>         Type: Task
>     Reporter: Brett Porter
>     Assignee: Emmanuel Venisse
>     Priority: Blocker
>      Fix For: 1.1-beta-2

>
>
> avoid the need for forkmode=once by switching to the superior surefire plugin 
> for general testing.
> Enhance the surefire mojo to provide the same output as junit so that the 
> test plugin remains backwards compatible.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to