I don't see the point of including the submitted by, probably it can be obtained in any other way from the issue number. I agree with the jira issue number
On 10/27/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed a few things going into commit messages, for which I > usually use a standard form (that matches a template that used to exist > in Apache's CVS). > > Basically, wehere applicable: > > PR: issue1, issue2 (using issue keys from JIRA, not URLs) > Submitted by: (when it was a patch, put that persons name there) > Reviewed by: (not sure if this is useful, but was in the template - who > reviewed it) > << comment >> > > What do folks think of using this? I just find it a bit easier to parse > when scanning, and also as we move to get JIRA including all our commits > linked in issues the first part is especially helpful. > > Just a thought... don't know if we can have a template for SVN commit > messages like CVS though. > > - Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
