On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 13:10 +0100, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Brett Porter wrote: > > +0.
+0 myself, I agree with Kenney's arguments. > > I believe these projects are not technically maven related, and hence do > not require to be in the m2 repository. It would be the same as moving > classworlds to maven2, except we know classworlds is also used by other > projects. To promote usage of these components without requiring maven2 I > believe it's best to leave them on a separate repository. This also > reduces 'hacking' those projects to create special maven2 shortcuts. > > Also when people are using it in mojo projects (especially doxia, when the > site plugin is moved to mojo someday, as I believe are the plans), > it will be harder to give them commit access if these libs are hosted at > apache. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
