Jeff Jensen a écrit :
-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 4:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: no such provider 'clearcase'
Thanks Jeff.
Do you have access to Perforce and Perforce environment?
Yes I do, a few in fact.
Ooops, it was Perforce and VSS :)
Can you help us to write providers for them?
Yes - I can test things and contribute to discussions.
I hope to help code too. Time is always our enemy, and my pace may not be
fast enough. First step is "ramp up" - I haven’t looked yet for a "how to
write a provider guide", etc., but that should be the first step.
BTW, I am glad you are replacing "checkout" with "edit" for these SCMs that
use those commands differently.
Jeff Jensen a écrit :
Some more command/term comparisons:
Edit works well for Perforce (edit and checkout are same for
Perforce). VSS calls it checkout. I think edit works well for all.
Perforce uses the term "revert" for "unedit".
VSS uses the term "undo checkout" for "unedit", as ClearCase does.
Lock/unlock exists in Perforce, but not VSS.
VSS checkouts are either exclusive or not exclusive, as set by a
server config setting. It is not per checkout like
Perforce and ClearCase.
"cvs edit" is the closest thing to a lock in CVS - it is only
notifying server/users of "edit in progress" for "cvs watch"-ers.
not only. If a file is in edit mode, other users can't commit
modification on it.
CVS does not have reserved/locked checkouts. Edit/watch is meant to track
and notify users editing files, not do locked checkouts.
CVS allows multiple "cvs edit"s on one file. The only time I can think of
that a commit fails in this scenario is when one user uses the "advisory
locks" feature (cvs edit -c) and another user attempting a commit did not
start with a cvs edit too.
It has been awhile since I last used CVS, so I could be off a little (or a
lot!)... :-)
Quoting Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
do we have lock/unlock implementations in other providers?
I don't think.
edit/unedit seems to be the correct name of those commands, those
terms are use at least for clearcase and cvs.
Emmanuel
dan tran a écrit :
edit/unedit seems to be a sensible names. Emmanuel, so we need to
move the implementations of lock/unlock to other provider as well?
Wim, yes ... unedit is undo checkout for clearcase.
-Dan
On 11/18/05, *Wim Deblauwe* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I will help with the checkout command once we
understand most
common usecases. Agree now
that you can focus on getting release plugin to
work. It is your
call to throw except in
checkout command.
ok, thank you for wanting to help me out.
One of my experience learning from
maven scm folks is write junit test cases will
help a lot during
integration with other maven plugin
and continuum. Starteam was a big surprise for me since it
integrates seemlessly.
Special thanks you for leading this effort with clearcase
implementation, i am sure other users will
jump in once this is started.
thank you for your kind words!
One other thing: I have now implemented unedit() as
"undo checkout"
in clearcase. I suppose you agree on that?
regards,
Wim
