On Dec 28, 2005, at 10:00 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
-1 to generic pre/post phases. For one, there's no difference between
pre-process-classes and post-compile.
Maybe that indicates that the process-classes is really a decoration
for the compile phase. We have several places in the lifecycle where
the same argument applies. Are there phases that are more concrete
then others i.e. like compile? Do we have them all? I don't know. We
can easily change the lifecycle phases like we are proposing now but
will we be continually doing that in the future.
Just to add my two cents to this discussion. It seems that the compile
and resources phases already have pre/post phases (although combined as
Jason suggests) and now we're discussing the need to add it to the
tests. That doesn't leave to many phases besides test except for
possibly package and deploy. But it seems like I've seen plenty of
discussions on the list that ask how that can do X right before they
and Y right before they deploy, etc.
As a result I would +1 this one.
Matt
________________________________________________________________________
___
Matt Brozowski, OpenNMS Maintainer Main: +1 919 812 4984
The OpenNMS Group, Inc. Fax: +1 503
961 7746
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:
http://www.opennms.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
