that's it On 1/11/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I understand now what you mean by relocate. > > We should put the relocation info in the POM, but still retain the JAR > in both locations. > > - Brett > > Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > On 1/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> A problem is that we'll be publishing things like log4j 1.1-dev, > >>> probably we should relocate this to log4j-1.1-2005.... to keep it > >>> consistent. m1 would still get the 1.1-dev but m2 will get the > >>> snapshot and a warning if somebody tries to use it. > >> I don't think so. The Maven 1.x repository basically doesn't exist (its > >> not web accessible). They are identical. > >> > > > > > > yep, but m1 won't follow pom relocations > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
