> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: jeudi 26 janvier 2006 22:14
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Integration testing proposal for Maven 2.0.x
> 
> Vincent,
> 
> There's a huge difference. Anything that goes into 2.0.3 must be made
> compatible. If it lands on trunk we can have a longer testing period and
> get people involved, and completely change it if it doesn't work out.
> 
> I have the following concerns:
> - adding an "it" scope. I haven't seen explained how this will behave,
> nor the impact on existing plugins.
> - adding something to the POM. I'm not sure the code is equipped to deal
> with an upgraded POM version yet. It's something we were aware needed to
> be done for 2.1.
> - Are we still adding another set of tests (something formerly called
> functional), or is it just two levels?
> 
> Here's what I propose:
> - formalise this in the wiki, cover as much as possible

I've just updated
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/best+practices+-+testing+strategies

Let me know if you have questions about what's there.

> - when it comes to implementation, do it on trunk. Keep track of the
> revisions and once we are 100% happy with it there, backport it to 2.0.3
> and confirm it is stable there.

I'd love to do it but I've realized I still have lots of work on the m2
book's chapter. We need to decide where I spend my time and if someone can
help. Let's discuss this offline.

Thanks
-Vincent


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to