jerome lacoste wrote: > Hi Brett, > > thanks for the feedback. > > On 1/26/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You can already configure plugins from settings.xml using profiles. > > Do you mean that the property will be set as the mojo property thanks > to the plexus javadoc declaration?
Yes. > > First I find that very verbose and less intuitive. Second, there's the > lifecycle limitation, and third, maybe I am wrong, but it doesn't give > me a simple control over which property goes where. That's correct, its not intended for that. > Properties are OK on a small scale. They are a little bit too verbose > wrt to the jar sign required information (too many properties to > define to my taste). But I still prefer that to the profile solution. I see more what you were looking for now. Properties are all we have right now, but pom plugin templating has been proposed already for 2.1 (maybe you could add your comments to the wiki?) - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
