No, that's right. You generate the patch and you attach it to the issue We'll apply it (after a little review) to the core.
thanks again. arnaud On 2/4/06, Doug Douglass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Sure thing, that does seem a much better place to put these things. I > presume I should then do an svn diff and attach the patch to the issue, > or is there another way for the test case to get committed? > > Cheers, > Doug > > > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > >Hi Doug, > > > > Thanks a lot for your help. > > Your testcases are very useful for us to close the issues. > > Can you try (when possible) to create your tests in the touchstone-build : > >http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1/core/trunk/src/test/touchstone-build/src/reactor-build/ > > It will help us to ensure that these issues never come back. > > > > For example for the issue MAVEN-1691 I created a testcase : > >http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1/core/trunk/src/test/touchstone-build/src/reactor-build/overlappedCalls/ > > When this issue will be fix, I'll activate it. > > What you need to do it's to automate your test to fail if the issue exists. > > Can you try to do it for example for MAVEN-1549 ? > > > > Thanks > > > >Arnaud > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Norman "Doug" Douglass > Director of Engineering > Denver Data Systems, Inc. > Office: (303) 534-1745 > Fax: (303) 534-2745 > E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: http://www.denverdata.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
