+1, especially for changes/jira and announcement stuff.
On 2/7/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not a vote. +1's here are just "I've read and think it's all > good", but generally I'm just looking for feedback on specific plugins > and decision points before taking this any further forward. > > Some of the plugins that wound up in mojo seem better suited to the main > Apache project due to a) originally coming from there b) having the core > libraries located there c) being essential to the day to day use of the > project. > > These are the ones I'm thinking of: > - jxr report (relates to jxr) > - surefire report (relates to surefire) > - changes/jira/announcement report (relates to issue stuff in sandbox) > - changelog report (relates to scm) > - dependency-maven-plugin (sounds generally handy in eliminating a lot > of small antrunning). > > The other ones I'm tossing up: > - taglist (generally useful report, originally came from m1) > > I put out a call for opinions and while the relevant mojo people were in > favour, some of the Maven developers were either on the fence or against > it. However, I didn't really receive an answer to my responses to those > concerns. > As a community we need to decide where we are going to develop > individual plugins. As I understand it, mojo.codehaus.org was > established to: > - develop things that can't be entirely under the ASL. > - avoid developing plugins that rotted and tied due to lack of community > in m1 > - give a place for individual plugin developers to start out but still > operate in the same way as the Maven community. > > It's always been my thought that plugins at maven.apache.org should be > those used by 80% of Maven users or essential to its operation, and > those that relate to the Maven subprojects themselves. Also, plugins in > like groups should be kept together. > > So, time to bring it here and get everyone's feedback again. If you > already had objections, please voice them again if they are still a concern. > > What do others think? Note that this would imply bringing in a couple of > new committers, but they are people that have been generally helpful. > > Cheers, > Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- .::You're welcome ::. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
