Brett Porter a écrit :
Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
- allow the adding of resource post compilation (to have the wsdl in the
jar)
You can do that by directly copying to target/classes in
process-classes. What you are doing is really processing classes as much
as generating resources. The only limitation is you can't filter them or
do other resourcy things. Is that a need you have?
don't need filters
- move the generate-resources phase after compilation (as it is not
needed to compile, the only constraint is to have the resource well
placed before testing)
I think last time we considered this, there was a reason not to in
general, and besides - backwards compatibility rules it out.
agree with backward compatibility
- create a new packaging (say axis-api) for axistools which binds the
generate-resource phase between compilation and test
This won't work, as a packaging can't define a new lifecycle ordering.
Please refer to the other mail, and lets see if we can get this use case
working under the 3 points I listed.
Maybe a way to get rid of the phases proliferation is to make
proliferate the packagings.
Therefore, the complexity of the phases are hidden in the
plugins-packaging and not shown in the pom which add the confusion to
the users.
Is that makes sense ?
Yes, I thought that was the whole point of it right now. Doesn't the
axis tools bind everything for you?
it does but by using the project helper (addResource) which is processed
before the compile i used a workaround by the antrun plugin.
Raphaël
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]