Hmmm...I'm not remembering so well these days either. (I'm also a bit disconnected from what the current surefire code looks like)
When I double checked the isTestNGClass logic though it confirmed that the basic function is for it to look for ~any~ annotations on the class in question. (whether qdox or native.) I think I volunteered trying to make it find/run qdox annotations from a 1.5> jre already anyways so I'm probably due for submitting a patch of some sort anyways. On 5/17/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > P.S. Not using TestNGClassFinder.isTestNGClass is the exact reason > (probably?..) why someone's base class with no test methods and only > @Configuration methods might not be found. Unlikely, as it is going to assume it's a TestNG class as long as it doesn't extend TestCase, right? My understanding was it was using the class, but running 0 tests, though I might be misremembering (I seem to leave my short term memory behind when I travel overseas). - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
