Brett means to make a new release to prevent people to use the old broken jar.

I've fixed it now, ibiblio should be correct now. I think somebody put
that wrong jar in the apache repo some time ago and that was it ended
in ibiblio.

On 6/30/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I'no Maven expert, and I'm not sure what you mean.
2.0.1 - are you referring to Lucene?  We don't have 2.0.1 yet - 2.0.0 is the 
latest release.
The 394k Jar is the Lucene's binary Jar (all .class files inside), so I'm not 
sure why you say that should be removed.

Looking at http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.0.0/ I 
now see a few .bak files, including the 394k Jar that haa been renamed (and the 
empty 2k Jar is back).  That looks wrong and that doesn't reflect what's here:

-bash-2.05b$ pwd
/x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.0.0
-bash-2.05b$ ls -al
total 430
drwxrwxr-x  2 martinc  apcvs     512 Jun 29 22:44 .
drwxrwxr-x  4 martinc  apcvs     512 Jun 11 09:01 ..
-rw-rw-r--  1 otis     apcvs  403597 May 26 10:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar
-rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      32 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar.md5
-rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      40 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar.sha1
-rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs    1690 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.pom
-rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      32 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.pom.md5
-rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      40 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.pom.sha1

Thanks,
Otis

----- Original Message ----
From: Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Maven Developers List <[email protected]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 8:38:45 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: lucene and maven2

I don't see any new stuff in the rsync process.
Also there must be something wrong with the jar at
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.0.0/
because it's 394k. I think I should delete it in the meantime so
people don't get it corrupt.

On 6/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd highly recommend a 2.0.1 release to correct mistakes in future.
> Maven won't download the new version automatically - anyone that has
> attempted it will need to remove the previous one.
>
> Please sign the artifacts and then I'll publish them.
>
> Thanks,
> - Brett
>
> On 30/06/2006 3:49 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > Hi Maven folks,
> >
> > I _think_ I'm supposed to email after deploying a new Jar to 
minotaur.apache.org:/x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/...
> > Please see below.
> >
> > Otis
> >
> > ----- Forwarded Message ----
> > From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:46:34 AM
> > Subject: Re: lucene and maven2
> >
> > I put a new Jar there.  Plese send email if things still don't work with 
Maven.
> >
> > -bash-2.05b$ ls -al
> > total 434
> > drwxrwxr-x  2 martinc  apcvs     512 Jun 29 22:43 .
> > drwxrwxr-x  4 martinc  apcvs     512 Jun 11 09:01 ..
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs    2336 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar
> > -rw-r--r--  1 otis     apcvs  403597 May 26 10:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar.1
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      32 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar.md5
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      40 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar.sha1
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs    1690 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.pom
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      32 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.pom.md5
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 martinc  apcvs      40 Jun 11 09:01 lucene-core-2.0.0.pom.sha1
> > -bash-2.05b$ mv lucene-core-2.0.0.jar.1 lucene-core-2.0.0.jar
> > -bash-2.05b$ chmod g+w lucene-core-2.0.0.jar
> >
> > Otis
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: sfryxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 11:52:56 AM
> > Subject: lucene and maven2
> >
> > what up g.
> >
> > trying to use the lucene-core.2.0.0.jar that is in the maven
> > repository at
> >
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.0.0/
> >
> > my classes won't compile against this jar as it doesn't contain any
> > class files. there is a pom in the manifest directory.
> >
> > was this intentional? is there some magical way to use an empty jar
> > with a pom file in maven? all the other jars i've pulled off there
> > have class files in them.
> >
> > anyway, thought i'd point this out before i assumed this was a
> > mistake and  stuck the regular jar  in my local repository.
> >
> > thanks
> > Scott.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> --
> Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/
> Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                            -- The Princess Bride

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to