Brett Porter wrote:
Thanks - is it definitely the inheritence? If so, that's a bug.
No, it's not the inheritance. I spoke too soon.
There are two other factors:
- a bug that meant a parameter without expression didn't appear (I
committed Edwin's fix yesterday, but didn't deploy a snapshot)
Two of the missing parameters would be hit by this.
- readonly and components are now omitted by design
OK, I had missed that.
Is a parameter like this:
@parameter expression="${component.org.apache...
considered a component as well as one that has:
@component?
If that is the case, then I think that all is OK. Let me know when a new
snapshot is available and I'll double check it.
Definitely needs to be looked in to.
- Brett
On 12/07/2006 9:45 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I've found a problem using the new plugin plugin. The "new look" for
the mojo documentation doesn't include everything that it used to.
I'm documenting the jar plugin. This plugin has an AbstractJarMojo
which the JarMojo extends. The abstract class has many parameters
that don't get included in the "new look" page. Only parameters
declared in JarMojo end up in the page jar-mojo.html. If I revert to
using maven-plugin-plugin-2.1 the parameters show up again.
Here are some examples.
Old plugin plugin:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
New plugin plugin:
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/maven-jar-plugin/jar-mojo.html
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
