Mike Perham wrote:
FYI I didn't even know this mailing list existed until this thread.
Subscription requested... So my guess is there are other committers in the
same boat as me.
The split-up was discussed several months ago, and it's listed on
http://maven.apache.org/mail-lists.html.
Personally I dump both lists into one mail folder, because then it's
easier to see which commit caused a build
failure. The continuum mail also lists the commit, but not the diffs.
But I'm still of the opinion that scm and building should be 2 separate
lists, so you're able to reduce
traffic and noise easily.
-- Kenney
mike
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2006 11:43:03 PM:
So... not much response on this.
We separated notifications from commits because of the theory that some
non-committers might want the commits and not the notifications, and I
could understand that some committers might monitor SVN via things other
than the list so would only be on notifications.
But notifications seems compulsory for committers. WDYT?
We definitely need to improve the technology behind it too to reduce the
noise and more accurately identify who caused a problem so they can
think to fix it.
- Brett
On 3/08/2006 3:09 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
It seems that build failures are going unnoticed recently. And for
once,
I'm not the one causing them (except that MRM webapp - doh!)
a) is everyone subscribed?
b) is everyone paying attention when they fail?
c) what can we do to make it better? (yes, getting everything into
Continuum is one thing)
- Brett
--
Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/
Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
