Sorry, we use a ton of OWL here and so I'm used to using it as a synonym
for RDF.
http://www.w3schools.com/rdf/rdf_owl.asp
mike
"Hilco Wijbenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/16/2006 03:55:09
PM:
>
> > Just as a compiled binary is a "binary snapshot" of
> > the code at a point in time, we need to take a "report snapshot" with
all
> > this metadata persisted for reporting on a module over time. Perhaps
each
> > report could optionally generate their own OWL metadata which can be
> > packaged by site into a "reporting archive" JAR and stored in the repo
for
> > each version of a module. We would need a version-based reporting API
to
> > trawl over those versions.
>
> Yeah, I guess that would work too. What does OWL stand for?
>
