Definitely +1! I am also agree with Brett's comment. Moreover, we need to review issues before and I am pretty sure that we could close some of them (specially doc). I will investigate.
Cheers, Vincent 2006/11/2, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm in agreement, but let's do this right - we should designate a build as an RC and put it out for some testing. If all goes well, we can call a vote. Thanks for pushing this forward Kenney. Cheers, Brett On 02/11/2006, at 8:45 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > Hi, > > I've talked to several users in the past period about issues in > maven 2.0.4. > It's getting frustrating to see users having the same problems over > and over again > due to bugs that were fixed 5 months ago. > > There are 53 issues resolved for 2.0.5, and Looking at the number > of open issues for 2.0.5, and still 178 to go. With the current > rate of resolving issues, 2.0.5 > won't be out at least for another 178 / 53 * 6 months = 20 months. > > I feel that there are enough critical issues resolved for 2.0.5 to > warrant > a release. Could we start planning a 2.0.6 release and move most of > the open > issues from 2.0.5 to 2.0.6? > > Here's my +1. > > -- Kenney > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
