Wasn't sure how certain we were about deleting these, so just raised
an issue (CONTINUUM-1063).
On 14/12/2006, at 10:34 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff
thats all
On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data
model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the
domain entities directly in the view?
I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only
exposes that required stuff for view preparation.
Rahul
Jesse McConnell wrote:
> yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and
> project group and projects bits like name, group, etc..
>
> so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume
>
> jesse
>
> On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view
data' for
>> preparing views for the webapp?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rahul
>>
>>
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>> > anyone?
>> >
>> > On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> >
>> >> I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be
>> >> partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used
any more?
>> >> What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem
valid?
>> >>
>> >> - Brett
>> >
>>
>
>
--
jesse mcconnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
