Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 8 Jan 07, at 3:26 AM 8 Jan 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 7 Jan 07, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
On 1/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jan 07, at 1:45 PM 6 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MREPOSITORY-2 project.scm.connection should not be required for
> bundle-create
>
Why not?
the project could not have a public repository, there are projects
that only distribute binary/source jars without having an accessible
scm at all.
Can you give me an example of an OSS project submitting something to
the central repository that doesn't have a public repository? How can
you operate as an OSS project without a public repository?
There are already several examples on that there. There is nothing in
the OSS licenses that requires the source to be publicly available all
the time, only the parts that you distribute.
No, there is nothing required other then a stipulation we would make.
Some traceability for artifacts placed in the repository. My thinking is
that at some point in the very near future submissions would be made in
the form of giving us a POM we can use to build the code and push into
the repository.
That would be really cool. and a very useful feature for a lot of
projects in the way that we could make sure that their POMs are good and
that their released project's builds are actually re-producable.
--
Trygve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
