Mark Hobson wrote on Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:52 PM: > On 17/01/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Perhaps, but I was thinking about the number of goals once we >>> introduce tree and list goals for every scope. Would we name them >>> dependency:compile-tree, dependency:compile-list, etc.? That's ten >>> extra goals, I'm not sure if it's easier just to type >>> dependency:tree -Dscope=compile. >> >> 10? I just count 6 instead of two ... only 3 scopes make sense - or? > > I was thinking all five scopes for completeness (compile, test, > runtime, provided and system). > >> What about: >> >> dependency:<scope> -Dtype=<list|tree> >> >> then everybody has the possibility to configure a property in his >> settings for the preferred view type ... > > I did consider that too, although I don't users would have a preferred > view type - it normally depends on the task at hand.
So we need the aliased command with predefined parameters? ;-) - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
