Actually, sorry for being misleading, but checkstyle as an extension seems to work just fine for me. However, I did notice that another case where I was using a build extension is broken for me. Again sorry for the confusion. I've created an issue for what I saw: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2821
-Stephen On 2/13/07, Fabrice Bellingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Brian, Strange, hey?... Which OS are you running Maven on? Because Stephen's got the same error as me on Fedore Core 6... Fabrice. On 2/13/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Fabrice, > I'm doing exactly what you describe and from what I can see, the latest > 2.0.5 is working ok. I did find an issue in one of the early 2.0.5 > release candidates, but it was fixed. The method I use is attached to > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2749. > > Thanks, > Brian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fabrice Bellingard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:02 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2) > > Hi Jason, > > The issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2795 ("Classloader problem > loading a resource from a build extension Jar") still breaks my > integrations > with this last build of Maven... :-( As you tried the test project > successfully, I don't understand what can be specific to my environment > . > I've made a clean installation of Maven (no local repository and last > build > of 2.0.5), and still it breaks the test case I attached on JIRA. > > Is there someone here who develops Checkstyle custom Checks and bundles > them > in a JAR (along with the configuration file) which is specified in the > build > extensions of another project? Or at least someone else who could test > the > case I described on JIRA? (with a clean installation) > > I may sound insisting on this, but the fact is that we have developed > custom > Checks in my company, and tens of projects are using them to generate > the > checkstyle report. As 2.0.5 currently breaks our builds, they wouldn't > be > able to migrate to this new and awaited version of Maven. Which is sad > because they're looking forward to using it... > > Apart from that, everything works fine. :-) > > Fabrice. > > On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/<h > ttp://people.apache.org/%7Ejvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/> > > maven-core/2.0.5/ > > > > Here is the JIRA roadmap: > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa ? > > reset=true&&pid=10500&fixfor=12294&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/ > > order=DESC > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Stephen Duncan Jr www.stephenduncanjr.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
