On 12 Mar 07, at 4:12 PM 12 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 12/03/2007, at 4:03 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 12 Mar 07, at 3:31 PM 12 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
should download.apt be removed from svn if it is generated?
Probably better to leave it there as people updating might forget
to generate it and deploy the site and then we'll end up with an
empty page. We can just nuke it when Velocity works in Doxia. Not
the most elegant of solutions but seeing as we forgot to update it
from 2.0.3 (which is probably a year) it's better then having it
out of date.
Not sure what you mean:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/
download.apt?revision=393226&view=markup&pathrev=517432
lists 2.0.4 (and ignores 2.0.3 and 2.0.1 as they were both broken
releases).
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/Bad2.0.3Reference.png
The checked in page is already out of date - the one you checked in
went from encourage -> encorage (while the template went in the
correct direction).
If you prefer, I can remove the shell script and put an antrun in
to do a filter replace instead so it's always right.
I would prefer the site plugin be fixed. Barring that I don't
particularly care provided I don't have to update 20 references when
I release 2.0.6.
Also, the current page seems to have *no* download of the ant tasks
at all. Are we just denying their existence now?
Are we actively supporting them? I have seen one or two questions
about them and I don't know what state they are in and weren't
released with 2.0.5 which is why I took them off the page. If you
think it's a good thing to list them then go for it.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
