Hi folks!

Having trouble with today's version of maven-release plugin. 
Looks like maven-release-manager depends on maven-scm-provider-cvsjava, while 
the deployed version is named  maven-scm-provider-cvsJava (upper case j).

Isn't that a bug of some sort?

Cheers.

Denis.

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2007 16:02
> À : dev@maven.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
> 
> Brian,
> 
> You can see what happens just by running:
> mvn -Prelease package
> then look at whats in the jars.
> 
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007 20:16, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> > So I can remove this code from my pom then:
> 
> Correct, shouldn't be needed.
> 
> > <resources>
> >                     <!-- Include the apache process LICENSE 
> and NOTICE files.-->
> >                     <!--uncomment for release. Commented 
> out for now to enable 
> > eclipse-plugin to work-->
> >                     <resource>
> >                             <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
> >                             <filtering>false</filtering>
> >                             <directory>${basedir}</directory>
> >                             <includes>
> >                                     <include>LICENSE</include>
> >                                     <include>NOTICE</include>
> >                             </includes>
> >                     </resource>
> >
> >
> > But is this still needed?
> 
> Nope.  Shouldn't be.
> 
> >
> >                     <!-- Include super-pom defined main/resources
> >                     Removing this section will break the build.
> >                     Since we have defined a new build/resources
> >                     section for the Apache process LICENSE 
> and NOTICE
> >                     files, this original default section is now
> >                     required. -->
> >                     <resource>
> >
> > <directory>${basedir}/src/main/resources</directory>
> >                     </resource>
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:46 PM
> > To: dev@maven.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 18:59, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> > > Is there a way to include notice and license files in the jars by 
> > > default?
> >
> > Well, we could pull the remote-resources plugin out of the release 
> > profile and put it right in the build/plugins section of the pom to
> > force it to always run.   However, there is a bug in it (just fixed
> > today) that causes issues with SNAPSHOT dependencies.   Thus, that
> > won't
> >
> > work until we release a new version of the remote-resources.
> >
> > Right now, the NOTICE and LICENSE files are injected in 
> when run with 
> > the
> > release profile only.   That's actually one reason we 
> didn't discover
> > the SNAPSHOT issue since the releases, by definition, don't contain 
> > snapshots.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 4:15 PM
> > > To: dev@maven.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven and plugins parent pom
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 14 March 2007 16:05, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > > > so we use the latest apache parent
> > >
> > > If we do, we should update to the latest gpg and remote resource
> > > things as well.   Specifically gpg so we don't have to have
> > > passphrases burned into our settings.xml.
> 
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to