Yes, I'm happy with where we got to with the discussion and withdraw
that. I don't think it landing in 2.0.6 is ideal, but I think it's
the best solution available to us today.
(sorry, got confused about the process - thought my -1 was only a
vote, not a veto)
On 19/03/2007, at 9:19 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Brett, Carlos,
Have you looked at the issue/code and do your -1s still hold or can
we put this through in the 2.0.6 release?
Carlos you did not specifically use -1, but I consider your object
to be the same.
I would like to stage a build for people to try.
Jason.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
