Yes ;-) The original pom is here :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/linkcheck/project.xml
You can see that we removed the extend and updated informations coming from
it.
It works also with xml entities even if I don't have an example here.

Arnaud

On 27/03/07, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1 to your plans.

(However, I couldn't see how your ref.[1] illustrates the new pom
features?)

-Lukas


Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  With release of the modello plugin we'll be able in some days to
release
> the new version of the maven-model for maven 1.x.
>  This new release includes readers/writers with dom4j, stax and xpp3 for
> the backward compatibility. The RC1 of maven 1.1 uses the stax
> implementation to read/write poms. It now supports XML entities. Maven
> 1.1RC1 fully supports the rewrite of the pom, resolving entities,
> inheritance,
> variables, ...[1].
>  The documentation is generated here :
>
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/maven-model/3.0.2-SNAPSHOT/index.html<
http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/maven-model/3.0.2-SNAPSHOT/index.html
>
>
>  Before to release it there's always one issue about the documentation :
>  - The maven.mdo wasn't updated when we changed the documentation in the
m1
> web site [2]. Thus the generated documentation is outdated in some areas
> [3].
>  I propose that when we'll have released maven-model, we'll use the
> generated documentation to replace the POM reference in the maven 1
site.
>
>  WDYT ?
>
> Arnaud
>
>
> [1]
>
http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repository/maven/poms/maven-linkcheck-plugin-1.4.1-20070325.224719.pom
>
>
> [2] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/project-descriptor.html
> [3]
>
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/maven-model/3.0.2-SNAPSHOT/maven.html<
http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/maven-model/3.0.2-SNAPSHOT/maven.html
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to