Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On 2 Apr 07, at 1:01 PM 2 Apr 07, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >> On 4/1/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 1 Apr 07, at 9:04 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote: >>> > Should this include the full change log like previous releases? >>> >>> I added a pointer to the roadmap, I don't think we need to entirely >>> replicate the list produced by JIRA. But users should be able to >>> navigate from the release notes to the full list of fixes. >> >> IMO, the list needs to be in svn (and I added it). JIRA issues can be >> reopened and edited, and may disappear from the generated list. > > So then the pointers to those issues are just as meaningless. If you > don't retain some integrity in the issue management system then what's > the point really? > > Just copying text around doesn't have much value. I don't think it > happens that often that an issue is removed. If any text is going to > be added it should be the changes text with full descriptions. I don't > see much use in copying text out of JIRA. +1 for static release notes content.
I think that if a jira issue gets re-opened, then the linked jira report will then be out of date. Also, if a reorganization of the jira occurs, the release information is lost too. Also, if jira isn't available, the release notes are also not available. I'm in favor of static release notes. - Joakim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
