On 2 Apr 07, at 8:37 PM 2 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/04/2007, at 11:12 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1 Apr 07, at 8:05 PM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
What was the final verdict on the velocity processing?
Optional.
Is this documented on the plugin site somewhere? I wasn't able to
find it.
It's not there as there are a few options that I'll offer as choices
and when we pick that's what will be documented.
Jason.
I can see this doesn't break a lot now because it's only
properties, but I know the next thing someone is going to ask for
is to filter ${project.*} which will break a bunch of docs. I'd
still prefer the user make a conscious decision to have a
document filtered (all they need to do is whack a .vm extension
on the document). I also note the current site has an ugly
exception during generation due to this, though it does handle
the outcome correctly.
Will the site plugin be another beta release? Looking at the
current JIRA, I think the 2.0 still represents a beta-quality
release, where 2.0.1 looks more like 2.0.
Probably should be alpha, another thing that jumped the gun but
another beta for sure.
Cool. I'll rename in JIRA.
Sure, if you haven't I can pop those in there and I will work on
what I can. But I want to get the base doxia stuff out and people
are clamoring for the site plugin so getting what's out now is
more important but the time is consumed in running in all the
older containers to make sure things still work. Which is how I
found the container/api JAR problem.
Ok, will do.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
